I use Buffout.
I can't speak to anything with any confidence other than I enable the Looksmenu patch and that for me now runs better.
I like the logs, and my gut seems to think my overall game is more stable; which may solely be attributed to removing mods that conflict with buffout or generate a crash that points to problem mods in the crash logs, or that have been reported, confirmed, and documented by the buffout community/users/author.
I used Baka for a long time but in my hours of gameplay could not confirm a tangible change; nor, did it have the magnitude of community-generated information that buffout does and directly or indirectly seems to have the biggest benefit to my game.
It is often easy to overcomplicate a Fo4 install in the search for a more stable game. This distracts from other simpler and more important fundamentals of a good install where the player has at least a basic understanding of what they have done so to glean some kind of cause and effect. Buffout does so with the logs, F4dit does so with conflicts, and Fallrim can confirm other issues like bad-mod discipline or script/stack back-ups. These three tools can help a player understand "cause and effect" which in my opinion is the insight I am looking for.
My suggestion is to pick one but for me, one has more feedback. Plus, there is another tool on the nexus for it that helps to interpret the Buffout crash logs. I have not yet had the occasion to try it, as I rarely crash nowadays. I have an old crash log I have been meaning to push through it
I might just be lazy right now though.
My humble suggestion is to spend the time you have outside of the game learning F04edit.
That suggestion is mostly due to me having to take someone else's word on anything to do with scripting.
F4edit can have immediate and profound effects on a player's insight into your game stability, LO issues, and what you can actually get away with. hahahaha, magic? I'll play skyrim for that..
hahaha, kidding..